
In For This Land: Writings on Religion in America by Vine Deloria, Jr., 1-18. New
York and London: Routledge,
1999. |
On September 9, 1974, the weekly news magazine Time reported that a survey of religious leaders and scholars had produced a
list
of eleven "shapers and shakers of the Christian faith," including Vine
Deloria,
Jr. It remains one of the most unusual honors Deloria has received in
his
long and distinguished career as activist, author, and educator.
Interchurch
Features, a New York-based consortium of Christian periodicals
published
in the United States and Canada, sponsored the poll; they asked survey
participants
to identify the most promising religious figures in the modern world,
the
"Theological Superstars of the Future." Named to the list along with
Deloria
were five Roman Catholics and five Protestants including theologians
Hans
Küng and Jürgen Moltmann and evangelist Billy Graham. Time identified Deloria only as a "Sioux Indian Lawyer" who "says flatly
that
he is no longer a Christian at all," though he offered evidence that
his
sense of humor had not wavered when, in another context, he described
his
religious affiliation as "Seven Day Absentist."
Why would influential representatives of
North America’s
Christian establishment choose such an iconoclast–and an apostate one
at
that–for their roster of religious luminaries? Writing in The
Christian
Century, one of the periodicals that sponsored the Interchurch
Features
survey, columnist Martin Marty suggested that some degree of liberal
tokenism
was involved in the process; the list also included one Latin American,
one
African, and one woman, three demographic strongholds of modern
Christianity
that are still under-represented in ecclesiastical leadership and
theological
scholarship. American Indians have always occupied a special place in
the
colonial psychology of European immigrants, though many Indians have
been
less than enthusiastic about their involvement with those immigrants’
religious
communities. As a seminary graduate and one of the most prominent
Indian
leaders since the mid-sixties, Deloria likely seemed an obvious and
convenient
choice. Even more important, however, were his critical writings on the
contemporary American predicament, which had not gone unnoticed in the
nation’s
pulpits and pews. Five books published in as many years, including his
provocatively
titled works Custer Died for Your Sins (1969) and God Is Red (1973), aimed to disrupt the self-serving laziness of any tokenistic
gestures. Apparently anticipating the objections of their more
conservative readers,
the Interchurch Features editors justified Deloria’s inclusion on the
list
by pointing out that he "offers North Americans a stirring call for
society’s
repentance and reform."
If Deloria’s selection as a "Theological
Superstar
of the Future" seemed an appropriate recognition at the time, it was
not
a particularly good predictor of his subsequent impact as a "shaper and
shaker
of the Christian faith." All of his fellow luminaries went on to
distinguish
themselves as religious leaders and scholars and today are among the
most
influential figures in their particular corners of the Christian world.
Yet Deloria has never been listed in Who’s Who in Religion (through
four editions, 1975-92) or among the 550 individuals included in the Dictionary
of American Religious Biography, and the Encyclopedia of the
American
Religious Experience and The Encyclopedia of American Religious
History also contain no reference to Deloria or his writings. Mircea Eliade’s
definitive,
sixteen-volume Encyclopedia of Religion includes only two brief
mentions
of Deloria’s work: a quote from his introduction to the 1979 edition of Black Elk Speaks, and a bibliographic reference to God
Is Red. And although many American Indian leaders and American
Indian studies scholars
regard Deloria to be one of the most influential Indian figures of the
twentieth
century, he is best known today for his contributions in political and
legal
affairs, not for his critical insights on religious matters. How should
we account for this turn of events? Was Deloria a theological superstar
or only a meteor, a charismatic streak of light in the religious
firmament?
Like several of his fellow luminaries,
Deloria’s
intellectual energies have been divided between religious affairs and
other
pressing concerns for much of his professional career. His continuing
involvement
in the persistent political struggles facing American Indians has
precluded
the kinds of theological contributions made by prolific European
scholars
such as Küng and Moltmann. And unlike all of the other ten
superstars,
Deloria has dissented from the Western religious mainstream by
maintaining
a non-Christian stance, not relying on any Christian institutions for
bureaucratic
legitimation. His writings have elicited very little critical response
from
scholars of religion, perhaps because his ideas are simply too far
outside
the bounds of prevailing academic sentiment, which is still burdened by
an
unfortunate intellectual parochialism. Only a few scholars of religion
have
responded in print to the criticisms and proposals contained in God
Is
Red and Deloria’s other early writings. Many have been put off by
his
polemical style or his incisive approach to contemporary conflicts.
The essays collected in this volume
demonstrate
that despite the demands of his political involvements, and despite a
lack
of critical response to his religious publications, Deloria has not
stopped
thinking and writing about religion. In dozens of occasional pieces
published
during the last three decades, he has offered substantive and
persistent
contributions to understanding the complexity of religion in America.
Some
of his provocative essays have been written for scholarly journals or
religious
periodicals, while others have suggested perceptive interpretations of
contemporary
religious affairs aimed at a more general audience. Many readers assume
that Deloria has offered a definitive statement of his views on
religion
in God Is Red, but this supposition overlooks a wide-ranging
body
of work articulating insightful perspectives on controversial religious
issues. These occasional writings document an abiding concern for the
religious
dimensions and implications of human existence. Deloria’s intellectual
sensibilities
developed out of his family background and organizational commitments;
these
essays are best understood in the context of his personal and
professional
experiences, which have framed his discursive intentions.
An American Life
Vine Deloria, Jr., was born in Martin,
South
Dakota,
on March 26, 1933; he entered the world at the edge of the Pine Ridge
Reservation
and on the brink of a new era in Indian affairs. He seemed destined for
a life spent straddling other kinds of frontiers as well, the first
child
of a prominent Dakota Episcopal missionary priest and his
Anglo-American
wife. Deloria inherited a number of important dispositions from his
forebears
including an appreciation for disciplined education, a commitment to
community
life, a healthy suspicion toward colonial institutions, a preference
for
reformist activism, a sense of religious purpose, and the articulate
voice
of a prophet. These and other personal qualities have made him an
effective
advocate in a variety of contexts, sustaining a family tradition of
leadership.
The family name Deloria is an
anglicized form of
the name of Phillippe des Lauriers, a French fur trader who
settled
in a Yankton community and married the daughter of a Yankton headman.
Their
grandson Francoise (whose Christian name the Yanktons
transformed
into Saswe) had a visionary experience at the age of eighteen
that
paradoxically granted him powers as a medicine man, predicted he would
kill
four Sioux men, and committed his descendants to serve as mediators
with
the dominant society. He went on to become a respected healer and
leader
of the White Swan community on the Yankton Reservation, where he
settled
in 1858. Saswe welcomed Presbyterian and Episcopal missionaries
when
they arrived, sending some of his children to day schools and having
all
of his children and grandchildren baptized. He attended church
regularly
himself but was not allowed to make any formal affiliation because he
was
married to three Sioux women. After one wife died and another returned
to
her home reservation, Saswe finally received Christian baptism
in
1871, and disturbing visitations by his four victims ceased.
Saswe and his first wife Siha
Sapewin,
who was from the Standing Rock Reservation, had their first son in
1854. Saswe favored him and symbolically bequeathed to him his
spiritual
powers by giving him the name Tipi Sapa (Black Lodge), which
had appeared
as an important element in his original vision. Tipi Sapa assisted Saswe in his work as a medicine man and was his
father’s
apparent
successor as leader of the White Swan community. But at the age of
sixteen
he decided–with his father’s encouragement–to pursue an academic
education
and to fulfill his religious vocation by becoming an Episcopal priest,
in
hopes of helping his people adjust to the changing circumstances of
reservation
life. He was baptized Philip Joseph Deloria on Christmas Day and left
home
soon thereafter to attend an Episcopal mission school in Nebraska and,
later,
a military academy in Minnesota. Committed to religious leadership but
dismayed
by denominational competition among Congregational, Episcopal,
Presbyterian,
and Roman Catholic missionaries, Philip was one of three young Dakota
leaders
who in 1873 founded Wojo Okolakiciye (The Planting Society), an
organization
promoting ecumenical fellowship that later became known as the
Brotherhood
of Christian Unity. After completing his education, he served as a lay
reader
and was ordained as deacon in 1883 and as priest in 1892, then
appointed
to supervise all Episcopal mission work on the Standing Rock
Reservation. He held this position until his retirement in 1925, by
which time he had
secured a national reputation as one of the most devoted and respected
priests
in the history of Episcopal missions to Indians. His cultural
reminiscences
were collected in a 1918 book titled The People of Tipi Sapa,
and
he is one of only three Americans included in the ninety-eight "Saints
of
the Ages" carved behind the altar of the National Cathedral in
Washington,
D.C.
Philip married Mary Sully Bordeaux and
together
they raised a family of six children as adopted members of the
Hunkpapas
living at Standing Rock. Their only son Vine Victor, whose Dakota name
was Ohiya (Champion), was born in 1901. Mary died when Vine
was fifteen
and he was sent to a military academy in Nebraska to complete his
secondary
education. He excelled on the playing field, attending college in New
York
on an athletic scholarship and envisioning a career as a professional
athlete,
but instead agreed to follow his ailing father’s footsteps into the
Christian
ministry. In 1931 Vine graduated from an Episcopal seminary in New York
City and was assigned to St. Katherine’s Mission and other parishes on
the
Pine Ridge Reservation. He served there for seventeen years, then spent
three years at the Sisseton Mission and three years at an Anglo parish
in
Iowa. In 1954 he was appointed to the National Council of the Episcopal
Church as Assistant Secretary for Indian Missions, the first Indian to
serve
as a denominational executive. He later recalled his time on national
staff
as the most frustrating experience of his career. Church leaders were
unwilling
to take his ideas and suggestions seriously, and he left after four
years
and returned to another Anglo parish in Iowa. He was soon appointed to
be
archdeacon of the Indian parishes in South Dakota and occupied that
post
until his retirement in 1968. Vine admitted to growing more critical of
the institutional church in his later years, and the seeds of his
eldest
son’s radicalism are evident in the fierce cultural pride and acute
sense
of justice Vine occasionally allowed to surface.
Vine and his wife Barbara had their first
child
in 1933 and bound him to his forebears by naming him Vine Victor
Deloria,
Jr. The junior Deloria attended off-reservation schools in Martin and
occasionally
traveled to tribal dances, held openly once again after the passage of
the
Indian Reorganization Act in 1934. He once described a visit to the
site
of the 1890 Wounded Knee massacre as the most memorable event of his
early
childhood, and his father often pointed out survivors still living on
the
reservation. As a child he also participated in the rich communal and
ceremonial
life that has long characterized the Sioux Episcopal Church, which
reaches
its fullest expression in the annual Niobrara Convocation, now in its
126th
year. Deloria left home in 1949 and finished his high school diploma
during
two years at the Kent School, a private college-preparatory school in
Connecticut. He spent the next five years exploring technology, first
spending his University
of Colorado freshman tuition money on a used car, later studying
geology
for two years at the Colorado School of Mines, and eventually enlisting
in
the Marine Corps Reserve where he was certified in telephone repair. In
1956 he enrolled at Iowa State University, where he completed a
bachelor’s
degree in general science and met his future wife, Barbara Jeanne
Nystrom.
They were married in the summer of 1958
and a year
later moved to Illinois so Deloria could attend a Lutheran seminary in
Rock
Island. He had considered pursuing the ministry in his younger days but
had also watched his father struggle with the denominational
bureaucracy
in more recent years. Instead of training for a Christian vocation,
Deloria
spent the next four years studying theology and philosophy by day and
earning
a living as a welder by night. He later wrote that "seminary, in spite
of
its avowed goals and tangible struggle with good intentions, provided
an
incredible variety of food for thought but a glaring lack of solutions
or
patterns of conceivable action which might be useful in facing a world
in
which the factors affecting human life change daily." In 1963 he
received
a graduate degree in theology and accepted a staff position with the
United
Scholarship Service, a church-supported educational philanthropy based
in
Denver, Colorado.
An American Reformer
Deloria directed a new program that placed
Indian
students in elite private schools on the East Coast, a position he had
been
offered on the basis of his own successful experience at the Kent
School. He insisted that students qualify for the program on the basis
of academic
credentials and quickly found scholarships for some thirty young
people. But the denominational leaders who were funding the program
wanted a more
paternalistic approach that would coddle Indians as token minorities,
and
they accused Deloria of elitism for his emphasis on excellence and hard
work. In 1964 he drove to Sheridan, Wyoming, to promote his program at
the annual
convention of the National Congress of American Indians. The preeminent
intertribal organization was conflicted, deeply indebted, and dwindling
in
membership, and by the end of the week Deloria had been elected to be
its
executive director. Until then a relatively anonymous young
administrator
known primarily in church circles, he was soon to become one of the
most
prominent national leaders in Indian affairs. Stan Steiner’s landmark
book The New Indians, a journalistic report on the growing Red
Power movement
published only four years later, quotes or refers to Deloria more often
than
any other single individual.
Resigning from his position with the
United Scholarship
Service, Deloria devoted considerable energy to reviving the NCAI as a
political
force. "I learned more about life in the NCAI in three years than I had
in the previous thirty," he later recalled; during his
tenure
he experienced both the frustrations of tribal politics and the
persistence
of white liberal paternalism. He began to see the importance of
building
a national power base through grassroots organizing at the local level,
and
he also came to appreciate the need for trained Indian lawyers who
could
defend tribal sovereignty and treaty rights within the American legal
system. By the fall of 1967, Deloria was convinced that the rising
popularity of
certain outspoken traditionalists signaled the beginning of a
revolutionary
era in Indian affairs. He stepped down as the leader of the NCAI and
enrolled
in law school at the University of Colorado, setting an example many
other
young Indian activists soon followed, in much the same way that N.
Scott
Momaday’s Pulitzer Prize-winning novel House Made of Dawn (1968) would
come to inspire a generation of Indian writers. Deloria continued
working
with the NCAI as a consultant, and during this period he also served on
the
boards of several national organizations including the Citizens’
Crusade
Against Poverty, the Board of Inquiry into Hunger and Malnutrition in
the
USA, and the National Office for the Rights of the Indigent.
Deloria’s administrative responsibilities
with the
NCAI included a quarterly newsletter, the Sentinel, which
provided
a forum for what would be his first published writings. In regular
editorial
columns, he turned out short pieces of social and political commentary
laced
with tribal nationalism and a sarcastic sense of humor, and he was not
reluctant
to poke fun at other Indian organizations as well. These commentaries
tapped
into a renewed sense of vitality and purpose developing in Indian
country
and were occasionally reprinted in tribal and denominational
periodicals. Deloria also found himself speaking out against popular
discourse perpetuating
racial stereotypes, such as a whiskey advertisement invoking firewater
and
old squaws. One of his earliest unpublished essays, "The Missionary in
a
Cultural Trap," was an elaborate parody written in response to a 1965
article
by a Jesuit missionary (see appendix). He also remained involved in a
few
denominational activities during this period, and in 1968 Deloria was
elected
to the Executive Council of the Episcopal Church. He chaired the
denomination’s
Ad-Hoc Committee on Indian Work and used this platform to propose
sweeping
changes in the institutional bureaucracy, circulating a document titled
"More
Real Involvement" in which he called for a series of reforms that would
facilitate
self-determination among Indian churches.
Despite the demands of law school classes,
various
organizational commitments, several trips to Alcatraz Island, and a
growing
family, Deloria also found time to write two books. Custer Died for
Your
Sins: An Indian Manifesto was published in 1969 and We Talk,
You Listen:
New Tribes, New Turf followed a year later. Both books were
informed
by his recent experiences with religious and political organizations,
critiquing
the "unrealities" of American society with a militant edge that caught
many
readers by surprise, and both also received national literary awards.
He
originally used the memorable title of his first book as a satirical
slogan
at a 1966 event in Washington; the phrase was immediately picked up by
the
National Council of Churches and also spread throughout Indian country
within
weeks. Custer Died for Your Sins was a remarkable feat of
energy,
breadth, insight, wit, and timing, securing Deloria’s reputation as a
leading
commentator on Indian affairs. It remains his best-selling book and has
been translated into Spanish, Swedish, and French. He had several
motives
and as many audiences in mind while writing the book, foremost among
them
the Christian missionaries still disrupting tribal communities. "Above
all,"
he concluded in an autobiographical afterword, "I am hopeful that the
churches
will give up this passionate desire to steal sheep from each other’s
folds
and get down to the business of helping Indian people. If, as they
claim,
Christianity is for all people, why not let Indian people worship God
after
their own conceptions of Him?" We Talk, You Listen continues in
this
line of thought by moving to a more theoretical exploration of
tribalism
in its modern manifestations. The book closes by examining the
collective
existential crisis confronting the mainline denominations, concluding
that
"the real issue to be faced today" in America is about religion.
Deloria was awarded a law degree in 1970
and for
the next eight years earned a living from a variety of lectureships,
administrative
positions, consultancies, legal cases, and publishing contracts. He
taught
in the College of Ethnic Studies at Western Washington University for a
year
and a half and at UCLA’s American Indian Studies Center for four
quarters,
and later held brief visiting appointments at the Pacific School of
Religion,
the New School of Religion, and Colorado College. He founded the
Institute
for the Development of Indian Law in 1971 (with the support of four
denominational
Indian caucuses), assisted several tribes on political conflicts, and
participated
in the Wounded Knee trials as both defense attorney and expert witness.
He also worked with various national organizations promoting social
reform
including Christian groups such as the National Council of Churches,
the
American Lutheran Church, the United Presbyterian Church, and the
Committee
of Southern Churchmen.
Deloria’s major writings during this
period reflect
his broad range of concerns and involvements. In 1971 he edited two
books
aimed at documenting Indian political history and reformulating the
contemporary
legal status of tribal nations in the United States. The Red Man in
the
New World Drama was originally published forty years earlier,
written
by Jennings C. Wise in the tradition of the historical grand narrative.
Deloria took the trouble to revise, update, and republish Wise’s work
because
it interprets the colonization of the Americas as "part of a world
drama
of conflicting religions," and Deloria considered this book an "opening
wedge"
in the effort to "shake people out of their traditional way of looking
at
the world." Of Utmost Good Faith is an anthology of
congressional
acts, judicial rulings, and other legal documents that have
circumscribed
the rights of tribal people in American society. Unlike other popular
anthologies
that commemorate the Indian past in tragic terms, Deloria’s forthright
editorial
bias here advances an optimistic outlook toward the future. Having
outlined
the historical basis for contemporary political and legal disputes in
these
two volumes, he proposed a systematic reformulation of tribal
sovereignty
in Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties: An Indian Declaration of
Independence,
published in 1974. This collaborative study grew out of the protest
activism
leading up to the Wounded Knee confrontation; it argues that Congress
should
address Indian claims by reopening the treaty-making process. Deloria
explored
these questions again three years later in Indians of the Pacific
Northwest,
a case study in tribal political and legal history on a regional scale.
Deloria summarized his ideas for a
Christian audience
in The Indian Affair. Published by a National Council of
Churches
press in 1974, the same year Interchurch Features named him a
theological
superstar, this short book on contemporary issues is more moderate in
tone
than many of his other writings on Christianity, in part because it
emphasizes
pragmatic considerations. His intentions were clearly more theoretical
a
year earlier in God Is Red, his most influential publication
after Custer Died for Your Sins and the book that brought him
special notoriety
among church people. God Is Red addresses the profound
spiritual
malaise in American society by deconstructing the Western religious
worldview,
which many have read as an attack on diverse Christian communities.
Dismayed
by the early response to his book, Deloria told a group of church
leaders
that "a substantial number of reviewers seem to think that I’m mad at
Christianity
or that I’m appalled by Christian excesses a hundred years ago, and
therefore
wrote the book in an attempt to get even. And that’s not it all." He
was
more concerned about the institutional churches’ "credibility gap," a
symptom
of "religious breakdown" and the "spiritual desperation" it has
generated
in the contemporary situation. The questions he really wanted to raise
were: "What are religions? How do they originate? And what can you
anticipate
[experiencing] in an ongoing religious life?" He concludes in God
Is
Red that religion "is a force in and of itself" that "calls for the
integration
of lands and peoples in harmonious unity."
In 1975 Christianity and Crisis published
a perceptive interview with Deloria by contributing editor James R.
McGraw,
who posed his own response to the book in the form of a question:
"Would
it be fair to say reconciliation is what Christians must be about, not
reconciling
souls to Christ but reconciling themselves to the land?" Deloria
assented,
hoping for "an emergence of white theology which would be derived not
from
the European tradition but from an American tradition," a sense of
identity
"steeped in American history. . . . I don’t think we’ve confronted the
American
experience in any profound way at all. So nobody understands who we are
or where we’re going. And that’s white and Indian." Deloria
examined
these questions more closely in his second major philosophical work, The
Metaphysics of Modern Existence, published in 1979. Again eschewing
public expectation that he write only as Indian informant, he surveyed
Western
philosophy and its social implications, identifying various trends that
indicate
a new vision of reality–one more compatible with tribal worldviews–may
be
emerging in American culture. In this book he "tried to develop the
thesis
that real knowledge of reality must be primarily a matter of perception
and
a careful handling of the process of deriving concepts of knowledge
from
those perceptions," but few critics perceived the usefulness of
Deloria’s
generalist approach.
In 1978 Deloria accepted a tenured
appointment as
professor of law and political science at the University of Arizona,
where
he developed a master’s degree program as chair of American Indian
studies. His decision to move into a full-time academic position did
not mean an
end to his extensive involvement in organizational activism, though he
did
develop a more rigorous focus in his research and writing over the next
decade. During the eighties he published several books and numerous
articles on
tribal political and legal history, most notably two volumes
co-authored
with colleague Clifford Lytle, American Indians, American Justice (1983) and The Nations Within: The Past and Future of American
Indian
Sovereignty (1984). Lytle later characterized Deloria’s approach to
social change as both energetic and inconspicuous: "He has been
connected
with most of the major movements in Indian politics" since the sixties
but
has "adopted a style of action that seeks to minimize public presence,"
since
fame often undermines effectiveness. "But it is a rare issue that does
not
have his footprints somewhere in the background." Custer Died for
Your
Sins was reprinted in 1988 with a new preface, in which Deloria
marveled
at the changes two decades had wrought in Indian country. He reminded
his
readers that "the Indian task of keeping an informed public available
to
assist the tribes in their efforts to survive is never ending," and he
asserted
that "the central message of this book, that Indians are alive, have
certain
dreams of their own, and are being overrun by the ignorance and the
mistaken,
misdirected efforts of those who would help them, can never be repeated
too
often."
Deloria left Arizona for the University of
Colorado
in 1990, accepting an appointment as professor of American Indian
studies
and history with adjunct appointments in law, political science, and
religious
studies. These varied departmental affiliations reflect the range of
his
interests and scholarly contributions and are also a measure of his
stature
as a respected leader in Indian affairs. The move was a homecoming of
sorts,
recalling childhood visits to Denver’s cathedral with his father,
several
adventurous years as a college student, his first professional position
out
of seminary, the publication of his first two books while in law
school,
and intense organizational activism throughout the seventies.
During the nineties Deloria has continued
to provide
leadership for a variety of local, regional, and national
organizations,
addressing specifically Indian issues but also working with groups such
as
the Friends of the Denver Public Library, the Institute of the North
American
West, and the Disabilities Rights Education and Defense Fund. He also
has
been the recipient of many awards and honors including several
citations
for lifetime achievement. He demonstrated his expertise in yet another
field
by writing a number of articles on education for Winds of Change magazine,
the quarterly periodical of the American Indian Science and Engineering
Society,
which published eight of these essays in 1991 as a collection titled Indian
Education in America. He also cooperated with that organization in
sponsoring
a series of conferences on traditional tribal knowledge about
astronomy,
animal and plant life, and creation and migration accounts.
Deloria marked the Columbus Quincentenary
in 1992
by publishing a second edition of his classic work God Is Red.
Now
subtitled A Native View of Religion as if to make his
theoretical
intentions more explicit, it is the only one of his seventeen books he
has
revised for republication. The second edition underscores the impending
"ecological meltdown" by raising "additional questions about our
species
and our ultimate fate." Convinced that relentless exploitation of
nature
will soon produce an "earthly wasteland," Deloria asserted that
"clearly
the struggle is between a religious view of life and the secularization
that
science and industry have brought." These concerns and long-standing
doubts
about the integrity of Western science led him to the subject of his
latest
book, Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of
Scientific
Fact, published in 1995. Framing the philosophy and methodology of
Western
science as a type of religious theory and practice, he argued that the
institutionalization
of science has led it to take on the form and function of religion in
an
increasingly secularized society. This has allowed scientists to "act
like
priests and defer to doctrine and dogma when determining what truths
would
be admitted, how they would be phrased, and how scientists themselves
would
be protected from the questions of the mass of people whose lives were
becoming
increasing dependent on them."
Deloria’s lifelong contributions to
religious affairs
and in the field of religious studies were recognized by the scholarly
community
in 1996, when he was invited to deliver one of three plenary addresses
at
the annual meeting of the American Academy of Religion. He applied his
legendary
sense of humor to the task and his address, titled "Origins: Physical
Reality
and Religious Beliefs," was one of the most entertaining conference
presentations
in recent memory. The message he brought, however, was of a very
serious
nature. He prefaced his comments by saying that he had worked most of
the
year trying to build a "centered intellectual structure" somewhere
between
religion and science, an epistemology that will allow us to interpret
those
anomalous human experiences neither approach can account for. But over
the
course of the year, he "kept getting dragged in backwards" to work on
various
legal conflicts involving issues of religious freedom. He went on to
remind
his audience that the analytical categories used in the study of
religion
are largely derived from Christianity, then described the ways in which
these
intellectual biases enter into legal proceedings. Calling on religion
scholars
to apply their expertise to these struggles, he asked them to get
involved
and help "straighten out religion."
To what degree do
we do
violence to
non-Western
religious traditions when we try and force them into pre-existing
categories? When are we going to free ourselves up and just look at
these things?
I have been in ceremonies. I
have talked to
spirits. I’m an educated man, I have three degrees, . . . I’m no damn
fool. And
I go through experiences like that and I have to find a way to
integrate
those kinds of experiences with what I already know and believe. And I
can’t
deny those experiences. They’re as real to me as anything in the world.
I think a lot of the material
we have on
American
Indians is real material. And if we give it credence, then we expand
the
area in which we can examine religious phenomena. I don’t believe that
people
having spiritual experiences are necessarily deluded. . . . People have
experiences. They may misinterpret what an experience means. But the
experience, as
related in a narrative straightaway, is a valid experience. We should
gather
more data into the study of religion.
An American Critique of Religion
During
the early days of his public
career, Deloria
was dubbed "the Rousseau of the new Indians" and "the red man’s Ralph
Nader";
three decades later he is widely respected as one of the most important
living
Indian figures, a quiet leader with the familiar yet enigmatic face of
a
tribal elder. The foregoing intellectual biography has briefly
highlighted
his lifelong involvement in religious affairs and his abiding interest
in
exploring the religious dimensions and implications of human existence.
Deloria’s family background, educational experiences, professional
accomplishments,
and published writings evince a certain consistency in a life marked by
pragmatic
eclecticism. His many books and articles have engaged a remarkable
range
of disciplines–history, anthropology, politics, law, theology,
philosophy,
science, education, and literary criticism–and together demonstrate his
broad
vision of intellectual activism. He is an impassioned advocate when
addressing
specific issues, but there is always something more to his polemic than
can
be expressed in a political slogan; writing as a religious
intellectual,
he is quick to see the wider ramifications behind immediate dilemmas.
He
is the consummate American generalist, with religion serving as the
overarching
motif that unifies his varied writings.
Some critics have attempted to systematize
these
diverse texts into a theoretical or ideological unity, a project
Deloria
wants to debunk. There are, however, a number of recurring features in
his
books and articles that suggest a consistent approach to written
discourse. He is an interdisciplinary scholar who relies on painstaking
documentary
research to ground his arguments. His historical accounts are synthetic
interpretations in the tradition of the grand narrative, although he is
motivated
by a holistic vision of human experience rather than a craving for
intellectual
hegemony. He has frequently collaborated with other scholars as
co-author,
editor, or contributor, though always as a popular writer speaking to
the
general public and not just to others in the academy. It is also worth
noting
that Deloria hasn’t engaged in conventional ethnographic scholarship;
the
seemingly essentialist arguments in God Is Red and elsewhere
implicate
social theories, not ethnic identities.
At the heart of his distinctly American
critique
of religion is the land itself, the physical place called "America" by
many
of its current inhabitants. God Is Red ends with a prophetic
challenge
to "the invaders of the North American continent," whom Deloria
predicts
will soon discover that "for this land, God is red." The American earth
functions as the source of human existence and the norm of religious
insight
in this place. It is not merely the premise for some ambiguous notion
of
sacred geography or a socially constructed devotion to landscape; it is
the
stuff of reality itself. As a stalwart defender of the rights of humans
and their earthmates, Deloria is for this land–grounded,
particular,
engaged–and whatever he proposes in the way of a theoretical system is
rooted
in a physical, not ideological, space. His writings on religion in
America
give voice to this intellectual passion by calling into question our
conventional
religious institutions, commitments, worldviews, freedoms, and
experiences.
The essays that follow originally appeared
in various
religious periodicals and other publications during the last three
decades,
though not all of Deloria’s occasional writings on religion could be
included
here. They have been arranged in five thematic sections, ordered in a
loosely
chronological fashion to reflect the development of his thought over
time. Interpretive headnotes at the beginning of each section introduce
the essays
and suggest how these unifying themes reflect his discursive practices.
"My intent is to plant seeds of ideas and raise doubts about what we
believe,"
Deloria wrote in a recent forum of public intellectuals. "Many of our
beliefs
are inherited, not opinions that we have thought through." Asked to
identify
"the greatest urgencies facing writers and critics" today, he responded:
We
are actually in the midst
of a "Dark Age"
of
intellectual activity. The Darwinian-Freudian-Marxist synthesis that
has
dominated the century has long since come apart but Americans refuse to
admit
it. We have a duty to move beyond it–ethical demands of personal
integrity
require it–but I see almost no one willing to undertake such a task or
even
nibble at the edges of the current synthesis to begin a critique. All
this
hesitancy while the hard sciences are returning study after study that
contradicts
this synthesis.
This volume of Deloria’s
collected writings on
religion
in America concludes with a retrospective afterword that appears here
for
the first time. "Why," he asks, "do we do what we do, why do we believe
what we believe, and why do our practices seem to fall so short of what
is
possible for us?" |